[Taxacom] Objective synonyms?

[Jim Croft]

a new combination or comb. nov., like a sp. nov., is only new or nov.
the first time it is made... funnily enough...  similarly nom. nov,

thereafter it is just a comb., one of several classes of synonyms.
the parenthetical authorship is a useful flag for this status, if for
some reason you might be interested in such things...

importantly, comb. nov. is an attribute of the publishing act, in
particular the the first place in which a combination is formally
proposed, not of the name, nor of the taxon.

to me they are are just a particular class of nomenclatural synonym,
being based on the same type.  for this reason I do not mind homotypic
as an alternative.  (don't like objective/subjective, because as has
been pointed out ad nauseum, there is an element of personal
preference into which genus a species could be placed, but none in the
epithet - the concept is clear but the descriptor is ambiguous).

rule #2 of taxonomy: follow the type

(the nym I like most is the nom. nov. - a taxonomic/heterotypic
synonym a new epithet coined when the required combination is
preoccupied.  a common practice is to use the name of the original
author of the unusable epithet.  so civilized...)

 jim

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:32 AM,  <Tony.Rees at csiro.au> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:41 AM,  <Tony.Rees at csiro.au> wrote:
>
>> Suggested solutions, anyone?
>
> To begin to answer my own question:
>
> Code Articles 51.2 and 51.3 refer to these new names as "changed combinations". Presumably they thus share a type (where designated) but are excluded from "objective synonyms" as defined by ICZN, although the combinations are indeed synonyms as per glossary entry Synonym: "Each of two or more names of the same rank used to denote the same taxonomic taxon" - refer Thomas Pape's most recent message.
>
> Here are some options:
>
> - Combination synonym
> - Synonym (genus transfer)
> - Synonym (new combination) / Synonym (original combination) / Synonym (previous combination)
> - Synonym (alternative placement) / Synonym (original placement)
>
> I thought about "sobjective synonym" given all the angst this topic has apparently created, but then thought better of it...
>
> I think the botanists simply use comb. nov. and related terms (Jim?) and regard them all as synonyms anyway.
>
> Regards - Tony
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Croft [mailto:jim.croft at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 1 June 2010 9:32 AM
> To: Rees, Tony (CMAR, Hobart)
> Cc: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Objective synonyms?
>
> yep...  everyone switch to the botanical code...  :)
>
> We have long recognised the three classes you describe and we do and
> show this through use and insistence on parenthetical authorship to
> show both the the transferred and the transferee.
>
> It is not all about glory seeking ego as some uncharitable zoologists
> have suggested.  It is about the pursuit of  'truth, justice and the
> taxonomy way'...
>
> In particular, the combination genus + species *is* the species name
> and the epithet can not travel in isolation from its genus, just as
> the author of the epithet can not travel in isolation from the author
> who reassigned it to another genus.
>
> The idea of combining the codes is a great and admirable thing, but
> from a botany perspective this is a die in the ditch issue.  Nobody
> wants to go backwards.  I reality, I think zoologists do the same
> thing (more or less) but they just do not regard this piece of
> information as important and junk it.
>
> jim (wondering if Linnaeus had any idea at the time what a mess he was creating)
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:41 AM,  <Tony.Rees at csiro.au> wrote:
>
>> Suggested solutions, anyone?
>
> _____________________
> Jim Croft ~ jim.croft at gmail.com ~ +61-2-62509499 ~
> http://www.google.com/profiles/jim.croft
> 'A civilized society is one which tolerates eccentricity to the point
> of doubtful sanity.'
>  - Robert Frost, poet (1874-1963)
>



-- 
_________________
Jim Croft ~ jim.croft at gmail.com ~ +61-2-62509499 ~
http://www.google.com/profiles/jim.croft
'A civilized society is one which tolerates eccentricity to the point
of doubtful sanity.'
 - Robert Frost, poet (1874-1963)