[Taxacom] Angiosperm origins: Darwin's "abominable" mystery
Michael Heads
michael.heads at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 19 22:51:50 CDT 2010
Thomas,
I think that's a good characterisation, using population diversity. Also, the angiosperm characters may have evolved before the angiosperm clade. This would explain why there is so much incongruence, with classic angiosperm characters such as double fertilisation occurring in some gymnosperms and not in all angiosperms.
Michael Heads
Wellington, New Zealand.
My papers on biogeography are at: http://tiny.cc/RiUE0
--- On Sat, 20/3/10, Thomas Lammers <lammers at uwosh.edu> wrote:
From: Thomas Lammers <lammers at uwosh.edu>
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Angiosperm origins: Darwin's "abominable" mystery
To: "Curtis Clark" <jcclark-lists at earthlink.net>
Cc: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Received: Saturday, 20 March, 2010, 3:11 PM
----- Original Message -----
From: Curtis Clark <jcclark-lists at earthlink.net>
> Axelrod introduced me to the idea of Triassic angiosperms; his contention was that, because they evolved in the uplands, we'd be unlikely to see fossils.<
I try to imagine what it would be like if we could travel back to study in the field the population to which the angiosperms of today trace their origin. I don't imagine we would see anything that, in the context of the flora of that time, would stand out as all that different. The population-biology view of evolution suggests that the characters that today are hallmarks of a well-distinguished class or phylum would likely have been mere intrapopulational variation at the earliest points in time. "Oh, look! In some of the plants in this population, the second sperm nucleus fuses with the polar nuclei! What an odd little aberration!"
Furthermore, even as some of these traits stabilized in species, it still may have been awhile before "anything came of it." Just as the mammals "hung out" for quite a long while in the Mesozoic before getting their chance to proliferate, so too might angiosperms have piddled around, cooling their heels, for millions of years before opportunity came knocking. We no doubt have found and named fossils that, if we could study them as living entities, we would call angiosperms.
Thomas G. Lammers, Ph.D.
Associate Professor and Curator of the Herbarium
Department of Biology and Microbiology
University of Wisconsin Oshkosh
http://www.uwosh.edu/departments/biology/Lammers.htm
http://www.kewbooks.com/asps/ShowDetails.asp?id=615
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
(1) http://taxacom.markmail.org
Or (2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list