[Taxacom] species names based on rejected genera

[Paul van Rijckevorsel]

Presumably the provision you want is Art. 14.6, with its two supporting
examples. The name Neurocarpus membranaceus could even be used
itself in those cases where its type is judged to belong to a taxon that is
distinct from Dictyopteris.

This looks rather academic as Neurocarpus membranaceus appears to 
be a combination based on Fucus membranaceus, so it is hard to even
imagine any objection to a new combination with this epithet.

Paul

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Athanasios Athanasiadis" <Athanasios.Athanasiadis at marecol.gu.se>
To: <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 3:47 PM
Subject: [Taxacom] species names based on rejected genera


> Hej taxacomers,
>
> who could answer these questions ?
> are species names of rejected genera, legitimate ? and which article
> regulates that ?
>
> E.g., is Neurocarpus membranaceus Weber et Mohr (1805), listed as the
> type of the rejected Neurocarpus (ICBN: 177)
> available to be used in a different combination ?
>
> thanks in advance,
> Athanasios
>
> Dr. A. Athanasiadis
> University of Gothenburg
> Marine Botany
> P.O. Box 461
> SE 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
> Fax int-31-7862727
>
> check updates on antithamniod algae & Aegean seaweeds at:
> www.marecol.gu.se/Personal/Athanasios_Athanasiadis_sv/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of 
> these methods:
>
> (1) http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Or (2) a Google search specified as: 
> site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here
>