[Taxacom] article on taxonomy

[Karen Wilson]

And some useful case studies were put together by Systematics Agenda 2000 back in the mid 1990s, in the booklet that group put out. 
I don't know whether that text is available on-line now? 

Regards
Karen Wilson
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Karen L. Wilson  |  Senior Research Scientist  Plant Diversity Section  |  National Herbarium of NSW  |  Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney, Mrs Macquaries Road, SYDNEY NSW 2000, AUSTRALIA 

Adjunct Assoc Prof, University of New England 
Secretary-General XVIII IBC Organising Committee - to take place in Melbourne July 2011 
Phone: +61 2 9231 8137  |  Fax: +61 2  9251 7231  |  email: karen.wilson at rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au  |  website: www.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au


The Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust is part of Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water  (NSW). 
This email is intended for the addressee(s) named and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete it immediately. Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water (NSW) or the Botanic Gardens Trust Sydney.






-----Original Message-----
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Lyal
Sent: Tuesday, 2 March 2010 8:09 AM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] article on taxonomy

Mary wrote:
 
" We need to gather in one place the stories about how systematics has benefited humans, not just in the past but now. I have said that I shall do this for herbaria. Some of the stories have not made it into print."

I think this is a valuable suggestion, and goes back to the point made by David Schindel about the needs for taxonomic information by non-taxonomists.  It is important to remeber that while taxonomy is a fascinating science in its own right it is (as we are fond of saying) the foundation of all other biological sciences.  This of course means that we need to be able to deliver what those sciences need.  

The original paper makes a number of comments about the CBD, and the theme of politicians not knowing what taxonomy can produce has surfaced.  It is worth recalling the CBD's Global Taxonomy Initiative (http://www.cbd.int/gti/ <https://webmail.nhm.ac.uk/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.cbd.int/gti/> ), which was a policy initiative put in place precisely because the CBD requires taxonomy in order to succeed.   The CBD, through the GTI, has called for quite extensive taxonomy products, but very much in the context of solving problems in biodiversity (conservation, sustainable use and equitable sharing benefits of genetic resources - the CBD foci).  Take a look at the 'Guide to the GTI' (http://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-ts-30.pdf <https://webmail.nhm.ac.uk/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-ts-30.pdf> ) for more information.  

In this context taxonomic work, in order to show its value, must be linked with someone who will use the outputs of the taxonomy to deliver a biodiversity benefit.  Examples of such taxonomic work (getting back to Mary's point) are given in the 'Why Taxonomy Matters' case studies at http://www.bionet-intl.org/opencms/opencms/caseStudies/ <https://webmail.nhm.ac.uk/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.bionet-intl.org/opencms/opencms/caseStudies/>    Another place to look is in an overview and review of taxonomic projects in the UK's Darwin Initiative, which can be found at darwin.defra.gov.uk/reports/briefing_note.taxonomy.pdf and darwin.defra.gov.uk/reports/thematic_review.GTI.pdf respectively.

There is a lot of policy in place calling for taxonomy, and there are people funding it - not enough to be sure, but there are some.  There is still, no doubt about it, a continued challenge to remind users of taxonomy what can be made available (and what it costs to produce - no arguments there!), but I think there is also a challenge to make sure taxonomists are actually delivering what policy is calling for.
 
Cheers
Chris


_______________________________________________

Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:

(1) http://taxacom.markmail.org

Or (2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email is intended for the addressee(s) named and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. 
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and then delete it immediately.
Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Department of Environment, Climate Change & Water NSW.