[Taxacom] New lizard species

[Stephen Thorpe]

>Linnean species are those nice, easily recognised things ...
well, many Linnean species are not that easily recognised (e.g., immature/female millipedes), so there is a continuum here ...

the question in these situations is 'What is to be gained from recognising these supposed "new species"?'

with so many undescribed genera even (at least of insects) sitting around for decades unworked in collections, I hate it when resources are wasted trying to "split the taxonomic atom" on some group ...

Stephen




________________________________
From: Bob Mesibov <mesibov at southcom.com.au>
To: TAXACOM <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Sent: Sat, 5 June, 2010 12:19:12 PM
Subject: [Taxacom] New lizard species

If you haven't seen it, do read

Leache, A.D. and Fujita, M.K. 2010. Bayesian species delimitation in West African forest geckos (Hemidactylus fasciatus). Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Published online as doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0662

In a well-argued and very clear paper, the authors plump for probabilistic determination of species, and name four *Linnean* species on probabilistic grounds. They say '...we are not aware of any morphological or ecological characteristics that differentiate these lineages,' and therefore diagnose their species as follows (one example):

'Diagnosis. This species includes all populations that cluster with those from the southern portion of the Congolian rainforest included in this study (southern Cameroon, Gabon and Congo), with strong support in the Bayesian species delimitation model.'

I don't actually have a problem with the methods used or the argument. My concern is that the authors confuse Linnean species with lineages. Lineages can be diagnosed within a probabilistic framework. They give us an insight into how evolution might possibly have happened. Linnean species are those nice, easily recognised things that enable us to retrieve biodiversity information, write field guides and feel that we have a handle on natural history.

It's been obvious for a long time that Linnean taxonomy and molecular taxonomy were headed in different directions, but this paper (IMO) is a clumsy attempt to yoke them back together.
-- 
Dr Robert Mesibov
Honorary Research Associate
Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery, and
School of Zoology, University of Tasmania
Home contact: PO Box 101, Penguin, Tasmania, Australia 7316
03 64371195; 61 3 64371195
Webpage: http://www.qvmag.tas.gov.au/mesibov.html

_______________________________________________

Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:

(1) http://taxacom.markmail.org

Or (2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here