[Taxacom] This week's paraphyly discussions
Kim van der Linde
kim at kimvdlinde.com
Tue Dec 21 10:11:31 CST 2010
On 12/21/2010 12:25 AM, Stephen Thorpe wrote:
>> All paraphyletic taxa are unnatural
>
> yep, true pretty much by definition
Yeah if you take that taxa should be representative of evolutionary
history. Which is arguable. If it is based on evolutionary similarity,
major changes in a single branch make it far more logical to have
paraphyletic groups. And in a sense, more natural. It just depends on
how you define natural.
Kim
--
http://www.kimvdlinde.com
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list