[Taxacom] This week's paraphyly discussions

[Pierre Deleporte]

and that's precisely why nobody cares
(just my opinion...)


Le 20/12/2010 15:03, John Grehan wrote:
> No, I just rendered my opinion.
>
> John Grehan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Redhead, Scott
> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 8:57 AM
> To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] This week's paraphyly discussions
>
> Have you bothered to look up the definition of "taxon" in all or any of the Codes of nomenclature?
>
> Scott
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of John Grehan
> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 8:40 AM
> To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] This week's paraphyly discussions
>
> If a taxon is paraphyletic then it is not a taxon.
>
> John Grehan
>

-- 
Pierre Deleporte
Université de Rennes 1
CNRS UMR6552 EthoS - Ethologie Animale et Humaine
Station Biologique
F-35380 PAIMPONT   FRANCE
Téléphone : 02 99 61 81 63
Télécopie : 02 99 61 81 88