[Taxacom] Usefulness vs. convenience (Protista)

[Stephen Thorpe]

but the "paraphyletic nut" is all too often too hard to crack ...




________________________________
From: Curtis Clark <lists at curtisclark.org>
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Sent: Mon, 20 December, 2010 1:41:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Usefulness vs. convenience (Protista)

On 12/19/2010 12:33 PM, Kleo Pullin wrote:
> I can see how Protista is useful;
I never saw Protista as useful. Back when I was an undergraduate (in the 
early Holocene) and first learned about "protists", I thought "Someday 
we'll know enough about these organisms to divide them into additional 
kingdoms." I was primed for this by an elementary-school exercise where 
I gathered magazine pictures of "mammals", "birds", "reptiles", 
"amphibians", "fish", and "all others". Decades later, when I learned 
the term "paraphyletic", I realized that every paraphyletic group is an 
"all others" just waiting to be analyzed.

-- 
Curtis Clark                  http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark/
Director, I&IT Web Development                  +1 909 979 6371
University Web Coordinator, Cal Poly Pomona


_______________________________________________

Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these 
methods:

(1) http://taxacom.markmail.org

Or (2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  
your search terms here