[Taxacom] hominid challenge

[Evgeniy Meyke]

John, I couldn't help... posting the link. That's it.

While I admit that the fact you mention was not known to me, it is not the
only failure in this video. Unfortunately.

Evgeniy


> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Grehan [mailto:jgrehan at sciencebuff.org]
> Sent: 27. syyskuuta 2009 19:46
> To: Evgeniy Meyke; Taxacom
> Subject: RE: [Taxacom] hominid challenge
> 
> Evgeniy - Couldn't help what?
> 
> It was quite funny to notice that the interviewer, in trying to make
> some coarse humor about whether viable offspring could occur with human
> and orangutan mating, failed to realize that male orangutans can and
> have successfully (from the orangutan point of view) forced their
> attentions on human females, and while female orangutans have not, it
> has not been for the lack of trying.
> 
> John Grehan
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:taxacom-
> > bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Evgeniy Meyke
> > Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 3:57 PM
> > To: 'Taxacom'
> > Subject: Re: [Taxacom] hominid challenge
> >
> > I am sorry guys, I just couldn't help it. As soon as I was shown
> this,
> I
> > just couldn't help it.
> >
> >
> http://redapes.org/video-media/daily-show-tackles-human-ancestor-
> debate/
> >
> >
> > Evgeniy
> >
> >
> > > > > > > Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:48:00 -0400
> > > > > > > From: jgrehan at sciencebuff.org
> > > > > > > To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > > > > > > Subject: [Taxacom] hominid challenge
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Here's a challenge to all list members who are rock solid
> on
> > > the
> > > > > > > chimpanzee theory of human origin, especially any who teach
> > > that
> > > > > > > doctrine to students.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What evidence do supporters of the chimpanzee theory
> present
> > > for the
> > > > > > > inclusion of early fossil hominids (australopiths) within a
> > > > > > > human-chimpanzee clade? This is not a question about
> characters
> > > > > > > supporting the monophyly of humans and fossil hominids, but
> > > > characters
> > > > > > > that support a human-fossil hominid-chimpanzee clade. How
> many
> > > > > > > characters and what are they?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is also not a question about molecular evidence since
> > > molecular
> > > > > > > evidence cannot apply to most of the hominid fossil
> evidence. I
> > > look
> > > > > > > forward to seeing that definitive evidence on this list,
> > > especially
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > those who are so cavalier about dismissing the orangutan
> > > evidence.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > John Grehan
> > > > > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Taxacom Mailing List
> > Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> >
> > The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
> > these methods:
> >
> > (1) http://taxacom.markmail.org
> >
> > Or (2) a Google search specified as:
> > site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here