[Taxacom] Article 16.2 of the ICZN

[Kenneth Kinman]

Dear All,
       This is so typical of PhyloCodists.  So many of them seem to
delight in undermining the ICZN and ICBN at every opportunity.  At the
same time that they ignore provisions of the traditional Codes, they
participate in promoting a PhyloCode which is even more restrictive and
illogical in the long term. 
      Quite frankly their mentality increasingly reminds me of those on
Wall Street who recently almost totally wrecked the world's economy.
Yet the PhyloCodists are still trying to push full-steam ahead, just as
Wall Streeters seem to be so soon returning to their own brand of
self-centered, short-term thinking.  NOTE: not surprisingly, New York
City also seems to be a center that promotes PhyloCodist propaganda.
New York City (like Washington D.C.) seems increasingly detached from
both the natural world and "normal" people.  
     During the French Revolution, some people like this got their heads
literally cut off for being so out of touch with reality.  Obviously I
would not advocate literally cutting their heads off, but they seem to
need to few kicks in the pants to remind them that the whole world is
not particularly pleased with their narrow view of where taxonomy should
be heading.  If it weren't for their own infighting, PhyloCode would
have been implemented about 2001, not 2010 or later.  Their internal
debates sort of remind me of the U.S. Congress.  The legalistic
strait-jacket of PhyloCode would easily make ICBN and ICZN look like the
good old days in comparison.  
****************************************************
Barry wrote:
I see the family name is registered in ZooBank and that the authors
followed Phylocode protocols in defining their clade-based taxon.
Perhaps when that code takes effect, all will be moot. One can then
choose one's code.