[Taxacom] Centrally supported electronic archive

[Mary Barkworth]

The problem, at least with articles and books that are not already
scanned, is surely the cost of scanning, particularly if the work is old
or rare. That is not insignificant. 


-----Original Message-----
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
[mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Peter B.
Phillipson
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 3:33 AM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Centrally supported electronic archive

I do want to deal with the whole article..... 

We should all be encouraged to read the entire paper or chapter in which
a
protologue (or any nomenclatural change) is published, there is often
crucial information about the whereabouts of specimens the author has
cited
and other valuable information in an introduction, illustration or
elsewhere
in an article, that can aid interpretation of the original author's
intentions, especially in older publications. 

I have often been frustrated in the past by requesting the page numbers
cited for a particular protologue through inter-library loans, only to
discover that essential parts of a protologue and its context were
missing.
With electronic media it doesn't usually cost more to send or download
all
the pages of an article than just the 1 page that contains the bare
minimum,
so why cut corners? 

We should also encourage authors (and databasers) to be as comprehensive
as
possible in citing earlier taxonomic references, so that it is easier
for
future generations to obtain all the relevant pages of a publication -
citing both the entire publication and the specific pages that contain
all
of the elements of a protologue.

Pete Phillipson

-----Original Message-----
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
[mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Paul van
Rijckevorsel
Sent: 27 May 2009 08:44
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Centrally supported electronic archive


From: "Jim Croft" <jim.croft at gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 11:59 PM

> When
> someone calls [f]or the protologue, we do not want to send them the 
> whole article.  With limited resources we can not afford to scan an[d]

> store the whole article when all we want is one page of it...

***
Yes, an important issue: if all you want is the protologue, you do not
want
to have to deal with a whole article. However, a complicating factor is
that
from a nomenclatural perspective it is not necessarily immediately
apparent
what the protologue is; in fact it needs to be be 'circumscribed' from
case
to case. In the modern literature this will (almost always) be
straightforward, but the introduction, etc to a book or article may also
contain material that belongs to the protologue. Say, the
Acknowlegdements
may comment: "we are deeply grateful for the hospitality of Mr
Przilowsky;
in acknowledgement we have named our third species in honour of his
eldest
daughter". Theoretically, there may be a separation of hundreds of pages
between one part of the protologue and another.

["Protologue ...: everything associated with a name at its valid
publication, i.e. description or diagnosis, illustrations, references,
synonymy, geographical data, citation of specimens, discussion, and
comments."]

It is not required that all the requirements of valid publication are
met in
a single publication; the final 'validating' publication only needs to
refer
to all the required parts, which need to have been effectively published
earlier. For example the final publication may be a few lines only, but
refer to a page-filling illustration elsewhere. So a protologue can be
spread over more than one publication. All in all, 'circumscribing' a
protologue is not a trivial matter. However, if the result goes into an
accessible database, it need be done only once.

Paul


_______________________________________________

Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
these
methods:

(1) http://taxacom.markmail.org

Or (2) a Google search specified as:
site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here


_______________________________________________

Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
these methods:

(1) http://taxacom.markmail.org

Or (2) a Google search specified as:
site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here