[Taxacom] Centrally supported electronic archive

[Karen Wilson]

A centrally supported archive (or set of mirrored archives) like Genbank would be ideal, Doug. 

Question is: how do we achieve that? 
I don't know how Genbank got started, but I'm sure others on TAXACOM will know. Is it a model we could follow? And what about central archives in other disciplines such as physics and astronomy?

Regards
Karen W

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Karen L. Wilson, AM  |  Special Botanist Plant Diversity Section  |  National Herbarium of NSW  |  Botanic Gardens Trust  |  Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney, Mrs Macquaries Road, SYDNEY NSW 2000, AUSTRALIA Adjunct Assoc Prof University of New England Secretary-General XVIII IBC Organising Committee - July 2011
Phone: +61 2 9231 8137  |  Fax: +61 2  9251 7231  |  email: karen.wilson at rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au  |  website: www.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au
 
The Botanic Gardens Trust is part of Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW).
This email is intended for the addressee(s) named and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete it immediately. Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW) or the Botanic Gardens Trust Sydney.

-----Original Message-----
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Doug Yanega
Sent: Saturday, 23 May 2009 3:16 PM
To: TAXACOM at MAILMAN.NHM.KU.EDU
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] ICZN position on Darwinius

Geoff Read wrote:

>PS. On reading some of the blogging, some by list members, I see blithe
>talk suggesting the publisher start altering the original as a realistic
>solution. Wow! Slippery slope! What if it's done in a less high profile
>situations? How do we know? How do we prove it? And yet another checking
>task for careful taxonomists.
>
>An illustration of a severe problem with electronic pub, IMO.  But maybe
>I'm too untrusting.

If this approach seems untrustworthy, maybe that's because it IS 
untrustworthy - meaning we need to find a better way. Though I'm 
certain to sound like the proverbial broken record, there IS a 
straightforward way to ensure that any digital documents the 
taxonomic community might rely upon *are* an authoritative, original 
version.

ARCHIVE THEM IMMEDIATELY IN A PERMANENTLY-SUPPORTED CENTRAL 
REPOSITORY LIKE GENBANK.

Once again, if we allow anyone to "archive" their own digital 
documents, then we guarantee the entire taxonomic enterprise will 
fail. Half-measures will, I truly believe, be ultimately worthless.

Which do you think will still be readily available to the scientific 
community in, say, 300 years? The digital versions of sequence data 
in Genbank, or the *print* versions? OH, wait...Genbank sequence data 
doesn't HAVE print versions. Are the folks at Genbank insane? I think 
not. In fact, maybe we could learn something really important from 
their example...

Sincerely,
-- 

Doug Yanega        Dept. of Entomology         Entomology Research Museum
Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0314        skype: dyanega
phone: (951) 827-4315 (standard disclaimer: opinions are mine, not UCR's)
              http://cache.ucr.edu/~heraty/yanega.html
   "There are some enterprises in which a careful disorderliness
         is the true method" - Herman Melville, Moby Dick, Chap. 82


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email is intended for the addressee(s) named and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. 
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and then delete it immediately.
Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW).