[Taxacom] Darwinius and electronic publication yet again

[Jim Croft]

from an off list post to Rich:
"I was really intrigued by the concept of "numerous" - it seemed so out
of place in a community of scientists.  So I guessed human social
evolution has really not advanced much past the 'one, two, three, many'
stage."

jim  :)

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Karen Wilson
<Karen.Wilson at rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au> wrote:
> Defining the middle term should be easy, but 'numerous' = ?how many: >2? >3?
> an arbitrary number such as 5 or 10?   -  and  'durable' = what?