[Taxacom] Rocket science, not?

[Paul Kirk]

Sounds like you are hedging into the 'registration of names' arena in your second paragraph.
 
The zoologists are already well ahead in planning for this - as are the Mycologists with MycoBank. Currently names representing over 40% of nomenclatural novelties in mycology are 'deposited' in MycoBank - partly by name producers who are required to because they publish in journals where this is required, and partly by name producers who are not so urged but do so because they see the advantages of doing so. Not sure where the botanists are. It is highly likely that the ICBN will change in 2011 to require mandatory registration for names of fungi. It is also likely that the developing Global Names Architecture (supported by, amongst others, GBIF) will facilitate registration and could be 'regionalized' under the current 'yet to be fully defined' GNA architecture.
 
Paul

________________________________

From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu on behalf of Mary Barkworth
Sent: Sun 10/05/2009 14:21
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: [Taxacom] Rocket science, not?



Rocket science is simple to a rocket scientist. Developing databases and
creating tools to make use of data aggregations is not straight forward
to many of us.
It seems there are a few changes that might help us all, whether
specialists or aggregators. One is to pressure an organization such as
GenBank to have a mechanism for recording - and making highly visible-
that a sequence seems to be based on a misidentified source. Of course
the original donor should be informed and given a chance to respond. One
of the features about IPNI and TROPICOS (both botanical resources) that
makes these such useful resources is that small errors are corrected
within 24 hours. For more complex questions, one is provided with a
wealth of information and contacts - and help in understanding the
problems one needs to resolve before a change can be made. Thank you
Kanchi Gandhi, Gerrit Davidse, and Jim Solomon (the people whom I
contact most frequently in this connection).

Another is to help such resources by providing them with the information
they need to maintain and enhance their completeness. Most journals
require that sequence data be submitted to one of the aggregating
organizations before or with publication. The same approach for names
would help. I suspect that some journals automatically submit new plant
names to TROPICOS and IPNI. If we could extend this approach around the
world, it would be really helpful - perhaps GBIF's regional nodes could
encourage such an approach. Clearly the software needed already exists.

Correcting distributional information in GBIF is probably more difficult
because there is so much of it, but at least there is a chance to do so
with the specimen-based information (and, with good images, some aspects
of observational data). What is difficult is when GBIF accepts secondary
data, data aggregated by some other source and fed as that source's
records into GBIF. Another approach that would be "not rocket science"
to someone with more computer skills than me would be to set up an RSS
feed from GBIF (or national nodes) when there is a new record for a
species/genus in a particular region. It should be possible to state at
what geographic level the record comes from, and whether there are other
records for the area under a synonym. Anyone want to develop this? Or
does it exist? If it does exist, please tell us where.

Mary

_______________________________________________

Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:

(1) http://taxacom.markmail.org <http://taxacom.markmail.org/> 

Or (2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here

************************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail and any files transmitted with it is confidential and is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is prohibited. 

Whilst CAB International trading as CABI takes steps to prevent the transmission of viruses via e-mail, we cannot guarantee that any e-mail or attachment is free from computer viruses and you are strongly advised to undertake your own anti-virus precautions.

If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail at cabi at cabi.org or by telephone on +44 (0)1491 829199 and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it.

CABI is an International Organization recognised by the UK Government under Statutory Instrument 1982 No. 1071.

**************************************************************************