[Taxacom] Addendum to my last post on Kingdom Protista
Stephen Thorpe
s.thorpe at auckland.ac.nz
Tue Jul 21 22:33:48 CDT 2009
I really do think that the time has come to let go of fondly held
Linnean obsessions of categorical ranks for taxa above family-group.
Surely "superkingdom" is a self-contradiction - analogous to
"supercosmos", or "superinfinite", or something! I can't see any
alternative than to simply use unranked clade names, though one could
perhaps SELECTIVELY label SOME as being equivalent to traditional
categories? So Eukaryota would look something like this:
Eukaryota
Amoebozoa - Opisthokonta - Excavata - Plantae (kingdom) ...
and Opisthokonta would go something like:
Opisthokonta
Animalia (kingdom) - Fungi (kingdom) - ... [add various unranked
"protist" clades]
Just a thought!
Stephen
Quoting Kenneth Kinman <kennethkinman at webtv.net>:
> P.S. I meant to say Superphyla (not Superkingdoms) Excavata, Plantae,
> and Chromalveolata sensu lato (SAR). Whether you want to call the
> second one Superphylum Plantae or Superphylum Archeplastida is up to the
> individual, but the term Plantae is far more familiar.
> --------Ken
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either
> of these methods:
>
> (1) http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Or (2) a Google search specified as:
> site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list