[Taxacom] Kingdom Protista (a preferable third optional coding?)
Kenneth Kinman
kennethkinman at webtv.net
Tue Jul 21 21:35:49 CDT 2009
Dear All,
A recent paper (Hampl, et al., 2009; in Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci.) indicates that the coding for the excavates (Clade 3)
needs a slight modification. Phylum Metamonada now appears to be sister
group to the other three excavate phyla (forming a new clade Discoba).
In other words Loukozoa and Metamonada have switched positions. As for
the problematic Family Malawimonadidae, I prefer to continue leaving it
in Phylum Loukozoa unless another placement can be shown to be more
likely.
As for the problematic Phylulm Rhizaria, there is
actually a third alternative placement which now seems to me to be the
most likely, namely as sister group of chromalveolates (rather than
*within* chromalveolates as sister group to Heterokonta). This change is
also reflected in the recoded classification below. However, at this
time, note that I see no reason whatsoever to change the number or
contents of the 16 Phyla which I recognized in 2006. It's just a matter
of recoding.
The biggest remaining question (in my mind) is just
another coding question. Does Phylum Amoebozoa form an exclusive
anterokont clade (clades 2-9) as sister group to the bikonts (clades
3-9), as my coding still reflects? Some molecular analyses show
Unikonta (clades 1-2) as holophyletic (strictly monophyletic), although
bikonts probably evolved from a unikont ancestor. I am still betting
that this unikont ancestor split off between opisthokonts (clade 1) and
Amoebozoa (clade 2), rather than some unknown ancestor of an
Opisthokont-Amoebozoa clade. Only time and further analyses will tell
(we shall see). Anyway, unless I have overlooked some pertinent
literature, the coding of the classification below will remain my
classification of Kingdom Protista for 2009.
---------Cheers,
Ken
Kinman
P.S. If you want to recognize formal taxa between Kingdom and Phylum,
the best bet would be Subkingdoms Unikonta (clades 1-2) and Bikonta
(clades 3-9), although Unikonta would almost certainly be paraphyletic
at some level. You could further subdivide Bikonta into Superkingdoms
Excavata, Plantae, and the SAR clade (i.e., Chromalveolata sensu lato?).
KINGDOM
PROTISTA
1 Choanozoa%% (= Mesomycetozoa)
_a_ {{EUMYCOTA}}
_b_ {{METAZOA}}
2 Amoebozoa
3 Metamonada (incl. Parabasalia)
B Loukozoa (jakobids and allies)
C Percolozoa
D Euglenozoa
4 Glaucophyta
B Rhodophyta
C Chlorophyta%
_a_ {{METAPHYTA}}
5 Rhizaria
6 Cryptophyta
B Haptophyta
C Heterokonta (stramenopiles)
7 Ciliophora
8 Dinozoa (or Dinophyta)
9 Sporozoa
----------------------------------------------
NOTES: Clades 6-9 make up the Chromalveolate clade. Clades 5-9 make up
the recently discovered "SAR" clade. Clades 4-9 is the photokaryote
clade (sensu lato). And of course, clades 3-9 still forms the bikont
clade.
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list