[Taxacom] The only systematics
Brian O'Meara
omeara.brian at gmail.com
Wed Feb 25 16:37:30 CST 2009
Serendipitously, the link seemed to go to all of DEB awards, not just
"phylogenetic systematics", where there seems to be funding for alpha
taxonomy of the sort you want. For example, the first grant listed is
<http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward.do?AwardNumber=0841734>, a
biodiversity survey of freshwater algae of the Hawaiian islands under
the Biodiversity Surveys and Inventory program. According to the
study abstract, "The objectives are to 1) establish long-term
archived collections of Hawaiian freshwater algae morphological and
genetic studies, 2) make all data available through a project
database and website, and 3) describe newly discovered freshwater
algal taxa from the Hawaiian Islands." This sounds like alpha
taxonomy to me (describing newly discovered species), plus some
bioinformatics and training -- "phylogeny" or "evolution" or "tree"
aren't mentioned at all. There are also the PEET grants (<http://
www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5451>), which are due on
Mar. 2 this year. There is info on other systematics and biodiversity
grants at <http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=12825>.
Whether NSF funds alpha taxonomy enough, relative to phylogenetics
and/or all other science NSF funds, is a different question, but I
don't think one can argue that it only funds investigation of "sister-
group relationships in systematics."
Best,
Brian O'Meara
On Feb 25, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Richard Zander wrote:
>
>
> At some point alpha taxonomy (and evolutionary taxonomy and
> biosystematics) has been replaced by phylogenetic systematics in U.S.
> National Science Foundation funding opportunities. Perhaps I am wrong,
> but I see no category on the NSF Web site that supports
> investigation of
> anything but sister-group relationships in systematics.
>
>
>
> Check out the list of recently funded projects at DEB NSF:
>
> (hope this URL continues to work)
>
> http://tinyurl.com/a9hncl
>
>
>
> You should only see "phylogenetic systematics" as a topic heading. Is
> alpha taxonomy now bankrupt and maybe needs a bailout? What do you
> think?
>
> *****************************
> Richard H. Zander
> Voice: 314-577-0276
> Missouri Botanical Garden
> PO Box 299
> St. Louis, MO 63166-0299 USA
> richard.zander at mobot.org <mailto:richard.zander at mobot.org>
> Web sites: http://www.mobot.org/plantscience/resbot/
> <http://www.mobot.org/plantscience/resbot/>
> and http://www.mobot.org/plantscience/bfna/bfnamenu.htm
> <http://www.mobot.org/plantscience/bfna/bfnamenu.htm>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Taxacom Mailing List
>
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>
> The entire Taxacom Archive back to 1992 can be searched with either
> of these methods:
>
> http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Or use a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/
> pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
________________________________
Brian O'Meara
NESCent
Durham, NC
http://www.brianomeara.info
________________________________
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list