[Taxacom] molecular species description

[Geoffrey Read]

On Sun, August 9, 2009 3:16 pm, Stephen Thorpe wrote:
>> Wrong again, eh!
>
> Wrong about the University he works for - yes. My apologies! Wrong
> again? Well, I have been wrong before now on several occasions, but
> I'm not sure which one(s) you are referring to exactly?

I need to remind you?

[S. Thorpe, 7 Aug] "It is a bit dated now, but I'm told on good authority
that the species described therein are totally unrecognisable today
morphologically or molecularly!"

And I pointed to the 2000 paper. And so I think we're on the 2nd lap of
the same track, so bye for now. Impressive back-pedalling & dodging
recently on your part though. :-)

Geoff