[Taxacom] Phylogenetic classification?

[Stephen Thorpe]

I have to agree with Ken here - closed source websites/databases like  
Tree of Life can never be kept up-to-date, and the reality is that the  
information on them is only as reliable as the contributor. The latter  
is also true of open source websites like Wikispecies, but it is far  
easier to keep them up-to-date, as you "can just do it, there and  
then", and it doesn't become a funding "black hole". Therefore, I  
strongly suggest that we discourage the use of the rapidly growing  
legion of closed source websites, and try instead to channel some of  
that wasted funding back into primary taxonomic/systematic research...

Stephen

Quoting Kenneth Kinman <kennethkinman at webtv.net>:

> Richard Zander wrote:
>       The present Tree of Life project much in the news should actually
> be named the Nested Parentheses of Life.
> ------------------------------------------------
> Hi Richard,
>        That's a good characterization of many of their trees.  :-)
>         However, in many other cases, I find the very opposite.  They
> won't commit to any real phylogenetic topology at all, and just fall
> back on a rather worthless polytomy (some of them being polytomies of so
> many taxa, I wonder why they bothered with a tree at all).
>        Either way, I often find their trees over-nested in some cases,
> while others aren't nested at all, and either of these extremes can
> frankly be disinformative or non-informative.  The frequency with which
> many Tree of Life accounts are updated is also rather dismal.  :-(
>        I'm sure many of the contributors are pulling their weight, and
> contributing on a regular basis.  However, others are probably taking
> the funding and not contributing much in return, and if the funding
> agencies aren't monitoring their contributions properly, then such
> "contributors" (to use the term loosely) probably aren't being prodded
> into doing so.  Both over-nesting and under-nesting seem to often be
> symptoms of strict cladism, although I suspect many of the under-nesters
> (polytomiers) probably tend to use it as an excuse to procrastinate or
> not commit to any topology at all.
>          ------Ken
> P.S.  Not that the Tree of Life doesn't have a lot of valuable
> information and trees.  But many of the parts that I am most interested
> in are frankly overly cladistic or worthless polytomies.  When they
> don't get updated for years at a time, you might as well go to Wikipedia
> instead if you really want up-to-date information and literature
> citations.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either  
> of these methods:
>
> (1) http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Or (2) a Google search specified as:   
> site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here
>



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.