[Taxacom] (no subject)

[Jim Croft]

But we do...  one is used by 'us'... and the other is used by 'them'...

jim

On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:50 PM,  <Don.Colless at csiro.au> wrote:
> I asked it before and had not a single reply. Why can we not have (both) a phylogeny AND a classification? The former to serve evolutionary studies (sens.lat.), the latter for general (including public) use?
>
>
> Donald H. Colless
> CSIRO Div of Entomology
> GPO Box 1700
> Canberra 2601
> don.colless at csiro.au
> tuz li munz est miens envirun
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
>
> (1) http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Or (2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here
>