[Taxacom] quote of the week
Hovenkamp, P. (Peter)
Hovenkamp at nhn.leidenuniv.nl
Thu Mar 20 07:52:48 CDT 2008
John,
>From your opponents you require the same infallibility that you claim
for yourself. Both are unrealistic.
They observe two sequences. They conjecture an alignment.
You observe two ears. You conjecture homology.
Same difference.
Peter Hovenkamp
Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Leiden branch
www.nationaalherbarium.nl
> -----Original Message-----
> From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:taxacom-
> bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of John Grehan
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 3:54 PM
> To: rjensen at saintmarys.edu
> Cc: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] quote of the week
>
> I guess it is radical, but then it's the molecularists who have pushed
> the distinction (and superiority) of molecules.
>
> I can observe or define an ear homology as something that exists in
> nature. When alignment is involved, as it is so often, homologies are
> created that do not exist in nature - they are the product of one or
> more alignment programs. So the sequences are empirical, but the cross
> species homologies of sequences are not when they are the product of
> alignment.
>
> John Grehan
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Richard Jensen [mailto:rjensen at saintmarys.edu]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 10:27 AM
> > To: John Grehan
> > Cc: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > Subject: Re: [Taxacom] quote of the week
> >
> > John,
> >
> > Are you suggesting that molecular sequences do not constitute
> biological
> > evidence? This seems a radical point of view.
> >
> > And, why is an observation of the morphology of an ear more
empirical
> > than determining the sequence of a gene?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Dick J
> >
> > Richard Jensen, Professor
> > Department of Biology
> > Saint Mary's College
> > Notre Dame, IN 46556
> > Tel: 574-284-4674
> >
> >
> >
> > John Grehan wrote:
> > > As you all know, the chimpanzee theory of human origin is all the
> rage
> > > because of their greater molecular similarity to humans than the
> other
> > > great apes, and that this theory of origin is contradicted by the
> > > biological evidence. For all the (usually blind) faith that is put
> in
> > > the molecular theory, here is a footnote published in Scientific
> > > American, March 2008 (p. 21).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "One thing everyone agrees on is that reading our history in our
> genes
> > > is fraught with pitfalls. Getting lots of data has become easy,
but
> > > working out which sequences to use, whom to sample, and how to
> identify
> > > the genetic legacies of natural selection, migration and
publication
> > > bottleneck is extremely touch. Even relatively simple analyses
> involve
> > > assumptions and educated guesswork and can take thousands of hours
> of
> > > computer time."
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > So you can chose a method fraught with pitfalls and educated
> guesswork,
> > > or the biological evidence where the characters are empirical,
> there is
> > > no guesswork, and less in the way of computational assumptions
> > > (certainly no need to resort to a priori theoretical models of
what
> the
> > > phylogeny should be in the first place).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > John Grehan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Dr. John R. Grehan
> > >
> > > Director of Science and Collections
> > >
> > > Buffalo Museum of Science1020 Humboldt Parkway
> > >
> > > Buffalo, NY 14211-1193
> > >
> > > email: jgrehan at sciencebuff.org
> > >
> > > Phone: (716) 896-5200 ext 372
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Panbiogeography
> > >
> > >
http://www.sciencebuff.org/biogeography_and_evolutionary_biology.php
> > >
> > > Ghost moth research
> > >
> > >
> http://www.sciencebuff.org/systematics_and_evolution_of_hepialdiae.php
> > >
> > > Human evolution and the great apes
> > >
> > > http://www.sciencebuff.org/human_origin_and_the_great_apes.php
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Taxacom mailing list
> > > Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> > >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom mailing list
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list