[Taxacom] FW: names pre-1758
Scharff, Nikolaj
NScharff at snm.ku.dk
Thu Jun 14 13:16:54 CDT 2007
... but is indeed followed by some - like Fauna Europaea
(http://www.faunaeur.org/). Try to search for Salticus scenicus, and FE
will explain why it is listed as Clerck, 1758.
Nikolaj Scharff
----------------------------------------------
Nikolaj Scharff
Natural History Museum of Denmark
Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen
Universitetsparken 15 DK-2100 Copenhagen DENMARK
Tel: 4535321107 Email: nscharff at snm.ku.dk
----------------------------------------------
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of
> Laurent Raty
> > Sent: 14. juni 2007 20:03
> > To: taxacom
> > Subject: Re: [Taxacom] names pre-1758
> >
> > David,
> >
> > Article 3.1. also states explicitly that :
> >
> > "Two works are deemed to have been published on 1 January 1758:
> > - Linnaeus's Systema Naturae, 10th Edition;
> > - Clerck's Aranei Svecici.
> > Names in the latter have precedence over names in the former, but
> > names in any other work published in 1758 are deemed to have been
> > published after the 10th Edition of Systema Naturae."
> >
> > These names should theoretically be cited as dating from "Clerck,
> > 1758", despite this work was actually published in 1757.
> But this is
> > often not followed in practice.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > --
> > Laurent Raty
> > l.raty at skynet.be
> > Brussels, Belgium
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Shorthouse, David" <dps1 at ualberta.ca>
> > To: "taxacom" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
> > Sent: Thursday, 14 June, 2007 18:58
> > Subject: [Taxacom] names pre-1758
> >
> >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > The World Spider Catalog has a number of species whose year
> > of publication
> > > precede 1758, which, according to Article 3 of the ICZN is
> > not acceptable.
> > > For example:
> > >
> > > Salticus scenicus (Clerck, 1757)
> > > Misumena vatia (Clerck, 1757)
> > > etc.
> > >
> > > There are at least 45 other Nearctic examples. I'm
> curious why the
> > > starting point for nomenclature is arbitrarily fixed at 1
> > January 1758
> > > when clearly, Clerck published these names before Systema Naturae.
> > >
> > > David P. Shorthouse
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Department of Biological Sciences
> > >
> > > CW-403, Biological Sciences Centre
> > > University of Alberta
> > > Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9
> > > mailto:dps1 at ualberta.ca
> > > http://canadianarachnology.webhop.net
> > > http://arachnidforum.webhop.net
> > > http://www.spiderwebwatch.org <http://www.spiderwebwatch.org/>
> > > ------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Taxacom mailing list
> > Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> >
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list