[Taxacom] Picobiliphyta?
Thomas Lammers
lammers at uwosh.edu
Sun Jan 14 14:31:33 CST 2007
----- Original Message -----
From: "James L. Reveal" <jreveal at umd.edu>
> And on the specific case of "Polypodiophyta instead of Pteridophyta" allow me to remind you that Pteridophyta Schimp. in Schenk, Handb. Palaeont., Palaeophyt.: 1. 1879, based on Pteris L.<
Shows what I know. I assumed that name was a descriptive one (descpite being aware of the generic names Pteris and Pteridium).
> Of course, priority is not operative at suprafamilial ranks and
> one can use
> either of the above. What should be avoided is a name like
> Filicophyta which
> was based on a generic name, Filix Adans. (1763), that is now
> both rejected
> and a later homonym (non Seguier, 1754).
Agreed.
Tom Lammers
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list