[Taxacom] Picobiliphyta?
Thomas Lammers
lammers at uwosh.edu
Sat Jan 13 18:26:45 CST 2007
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Kinman <kinman at hotmail.com>
>But first, I have to say that I think this is a REALLY bad name. Either way, the name Picobiliphyta is very
misleading. If they are related to cryptophytes (which would not surprise me at all), I wouldn't object to the name "Picocryptophyta". That would be a more accurate name and would not be misleading.<
Y'know, it's JUST a name. Just a handle by which to call it. It doesn't have to MEAN anything. As long as it conforms to the Code (which has pretty minimal requirements at this rank), it's a "good" name.
It could as well be called the Hillbiliophyta. Or the Kinmaniophyta. It's just a word, whose meaning is irrelevant to the thing designated.
I will say that my consistency hobgoblin would be happier if names of *all* ranks were based on a generic name: Magnoliophyta instead of Anthophyta, Polypodiophyta instead of Pteridophyta, etc. But that's just me.
Tom Lammers
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list