[Taxacom] "Bar Code" can track Nature's Inventory
Doug Yanega
dyanega at ucr.edu
Mon Feb 19 16:35:23 CST 2007
>Hi Taxacomers,
>
>An article in today's Edmonto Journal mentions that
>U of Guelph and Rockerfeller U researchers have
>paved the way for cataloguing every living thin on
>Earth.
They've been claiming this for years, and there are still a great
many people who feel the claims are grossly overstated. The problem
can be summed up in a very simple analogy; if you and I have
different fingerprints, does that mean we belong to different
species? Humans and armadillos are the only taxa on the planet that
can be infected by leprosy; does that mean we are the same species?
Determining what is and is not a species requires criteria OTHER than
the sequence of the COI gene. No single character is ever going to
tell us when things are or are not distinct species. Especially since
some organisms evidently have multiple copies of the COI gene, each
evolving independently. That makes COI a bad standard of reference.
So, if what the "bar coders" were claiming is that once we have
INDEPENDENTLY determined which biological entities are and are not
species, that we could THEN go in, sequence them, and use the
resulting sequences to *recognize* them, that would be a fairly
reasonable claim. What is not reasonable is claiming that because two
sampled organisms have a different sequence, they must be different
species (or the converse - that identical sequences indicate the same
species).
By no means is this the clean, simple thing the press releases make
it sound like.
Sincerely,
--
Doug Yanega /Dept. of Entomology /Entomology Research Museum
Univ. of California - Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521-0314
phone: (951) 827-4315 (standard disclaimer: opinions are mine, not UCR's)
Skype: Dyanega http://cache.ucr.edu/~heraty/yanega.html
"There are some enterprises in which a careful disorderliness
is the true method" - Herman Melville, Moby Dick, Chap. 82
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list