[Taxacom] authorities of kingdoms of life
James L. Reveal
jreveal at umd.edu
Tue Feb 13 07:03:43 CST 2007
Dr. Robert A. Andersen kindly provided a pdf file of the Hogg paper for
which I am grateful.
In looking at Regnum Primigenum, the name is not validly published (no
description). As for Protoctista, this is curious as seemingly it is
proposed as an alterative name for Primigenum. Primigenum and Protoctista
are defined as containing "the primary organic beings" this being all plants
and animals ("organic beings") as opposed to minerals which he recognized as
a kingdom and, obviously, are not organic. Hogg subdivides his "Primigenal
kingdom" which "comprises all the lower creatures, or the primary organic
beings--'Protoctista.'" into two additional groups "Protophyta or those
considered now by many as, lower or primary beings having more the nature of
plants; and Protozoa..."
Clearly Protophyta is unranked and also is without a description or
diagnosis.
Insofar as the botanical code is concern, Primigenum, Procotrista and
Protophyta are all without validating descriptions or diagnoses and are not
valid.
Jim Reveal
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list