[Taxacom] Hypothesis: How Nothofagus rafted to New Zealand

[John Grehan]

Not sure I follow the point, but thanks for the feedback. I'm don't see
the "Darwinian biogeographers" label at all problematic since the term
is well defined with respect to methodological principles outlined by
Darwin(of centers of origin and dispersal) and is no different to my
being referred to a panbiogeographer if I use the methodological
principles outlined by Croizat. 

John


> -----Original Message-----
> From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:taxacom-
> bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Curtis Clark
> Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2006 5:43 PM
> To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Hypothesis: How Nothofagus rafted to New
Zealand
> 
> John Grehan wrote:
>  > Agreed - although I don't think panbiogeographers need the
ammunition
> 
> Yes, as a matter of fact you do, since calling people "Darwinian
> biogeographers" doesn't advance your research program one iota, and
yet
> it does require evidence.
> 
> --
> Curtis Clark                  http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark/
> Web Coordinator, Cal Poly Pomona                 +1 909 979 6371
> Professor, Biological Sciences                   +1 909 869 4062
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom mailing list
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom