iSpecies

[Julian H]

At 10:55 AM 11/2/2005, steve Lingafelter wrote:
>\
>
>with thousands of images, many of taxa that otherwise have absolutely
>no hits on any search engine.  They are only on my site, yet they are
>often overlooked by the search engines and your site.  So it seems that
>it is still necessary to have a large library of bookmarks to cover all
>the bases without overreliance on a "simplified" search tool that will
>overlook many things.


Well, Google seems to find many (all?) of the pages in your database
(e.g. Noemia submetallica returns just fine). It doesn't find the
images, I suspect because your alternate text runs the name together
( Noemiasubmetallica.jpg) it fails to find the image.  I would
suggest trying the actual name there.  Google find images on
Digimorph in what I assume is exactly that way, despite the fact that
our file names are meaningless.

Very nice and fast site.  Is there a reason you don't include more
data with the images?

Julian



Julian Humphries
DigiMorph.Org
Geological Sciences
University of Texas at Austin
Austin, TX 78712
512-471-3275