threads on patterns

[Brad McFall]

On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 16:29:44 -0800, Kirk Fitzhugh <kfitzhug at NHM.ORG> wrote:

>Ken,
>
>I sympathize with your reticence regarding philosophical/semantic
>discussions.
To whom it may concern.
>Unfortunately, or fortunately, philosophy of science must be
pattern recognition will only get more difficult with opaque and
transparent virtual reality.
>stepping outside of that context and examining
>methods under the broader umbrella of conceptual issues that dictate the
>proce to the philosophical underpinnings of each.
 Neither I always thought SJ Gould mistoke Conant's newt plate ( in the
76Field Guide) for Weiner's neotinic man and that he took "advantage" ( a
Croizat word) of those younger (older than me) when he came to a sack lunch
at Cornell but neither is this a who beat up whom for  R Lewontin
constructors or not with me at dinner rather, at the Statler, that view,
when pushed on the material basis of sea snake tail adaptations caused me
to reflect on fish. Wrong environs Joyce.
>parsimony, nor inferential support, nor maximum likelihood, nor total
>evidence are issues th "issues BY issue(s)" of the coffe stain I saw on TV
was Alan *Mash* (Alda).

What is the straight line answer to a perfect circle between energy and
informational coupling? Feynman would not be adverse to my understanding of
Mayrs' Teleonomy for go land shark.

It is clear to me that my elders in seperation debate did harm a student
for the length of Great England.  I got only a smile when I wanted to
record a speaker who ventured to speak of Julia sets and genes.

And as to my thought on analytical embryology Twitty was up the wrong
state.  The chance to conserve we rapidly determine but Weiner'S fIBER is
not fiber-optic nor is the analogy to cable appropriate in any
machine/organism comparison not bandwidth.

I think this analogy has caused us to look in the brain at the cells we
remember in a misapropriated verticality for what if it was the skin we
could have thought was a horizontality ( for the cells, I mean.)

My grandfather had told me that "ontogeny recapitulates phlogeny" but I
understood neither recapitulation nor phlogeny so I had no problem
reversing the phrase in my question of why the milk snake had so many
scientific names.  I do not intend this perspective to be foisted on others
but in any spiral Lewontin was not justified to cause a herpetologist to
think of fish.

As if editing the [C]ell I do try to verify if my read on  the surface
perpendicularity of cell processes in the dermis-epidermis are not
developmentally prior to the system of nervous connection across this view
in the brain of glial cells for a nucleus able to  kinase  physphoralate.
This was in fact not acetylcoline receptor.  What o f Frolich??  BSM.