RE. Biological Informatics question

[Brad McFall]

I propose to use the virial to solve the conundrum in the term 'biological
informatics' whether or not it rotates genetics in a new revolution and
takes nostalgia back to a time before the distinction of bio-informatics
was taken for the metaphase plate of geneticists or not and only is of
service in a routable computer network of biological information.

Every gene in it's Mendelian instantiation will have a virial. These
virials will build partial pressure by pressure the relation of genomic and
protenomic informatics to the level of chemisty. Biochemistry begins with
some free path these gene-virials have spatially available that eventually
are cast in GIS areally co-extensive sets logically setting the stage from
recognition of Some hierarchy to the organismic tissue-organ-cell level
where upon acoustic/image processing and pre-DNA style genetics begin to
not object to morphometrics; multitasking up to the graphic anatomy of the
systematist generally but because with the expanded taxonomy that
visualizations have provided the taxa specialist and the best-guess-species-
location algorithm(s) by combining GIS(species and habitat layers), the
impetus socially providing for l-commerce spins up to a biodiversity object
web that from conservation and alpha taxonomy creates the deductive
biogeography irregardless of time as in the style of Euclid and Newton but
as part of morphogeny with or without virtual reality that is
psychologically needed to move beyond D'Arcy Thompson's treatment of the
same neglible or not for dealing with the food-population quey regionally
enhanced by biogeographic inductions through graph, set or group theories
with empirical geometry and cartographic GPS the spatial analysis provides
the incidence necessary to link planes or horizons to the growing
phenomenology of instruction in the finally Condensed gene pool to its
gaseous state that population thinking biologists have awiated the taxa
independence from and rooting these techniques in a biology and society
that must come to terms with biosynthesis much as it faild to timely
account in chemical synthesis initiates the new systematics that expanded
taxonomy offers a model in the attraction and repulsion of these
topologically (because created on computers) distinct entities that be
hybrid data-information carrier in empirical mathematics offer material to
further the distribution of this hierarchy to departments of physics,
chemistry and biology academically and for the public interest with as
little environmental harm as possible.

Should the force of dispersal find a realistic solution in this scenario
time dependence and geology may find a holdfast and temporalGIS as well as
gloabl policy may find expressiveness which Appear to connect by the virial
the fundamental particle or document validation for use in not-for-profit
or otherwise due to the phenomena of the information age by relating
the "focus" to Earth unless planetary links are clearly established (space
exploration biology informatics would proceed via some other orb..): the
virial assumption can be relaxed and the computational power put to virtual
reality may be harnessed to resist a mispercieved envirnoment that had
jetisoned the external variable for substantial improvements contianing a
fundamental seris or not that may or may not begin to use genetic loci
spatialized in biodiversity measures in a TemporalGIS GVIS enabled to
construct Within Earth orbit an intertial Frame Of Reference for use even
in psychology with attendent anthropological philosophy. Needless to say,
the US can not do this alone.

Furthermore managment of Any population becomes therethrough a realistic
endeavor accomplishable with or without the illusion between evolution and
creation because the taxogenist, in Croizat's sense, in Not necessarily in
this cognitive sense confined to time frames suggested by fossil data
alone; whose career could easily be consumed in programming for a number of
different employers as large as there are countries.

Eventually, the employment diversity will minimize but by then the next
step in the computer revolution will be upon us and the demands for
outerspace Biology will open up. Thus, there is no need to respond as
E.Mayr did to me in 1987 as to whehter it would be helpful to identify
specimens uniquely with irrational numbers because projects such as GBIF
are ESSENTIALLY attempting to do just this (see <http://www.gbif.org>).
Typological or not it is beneficial to humanity, that it should be free and
clear, while Mayr told others about not saying nothing not "nice". I think
this is as nice as it gets. It could get better but whose to say that it is
impossible to do good ecology polyphyletically or can the water (fluid)
around Anartica emerge from the Manual of Phytogeography beyond an ammenity
and be used in projection geometry service?

I a wait a solid response and not the one Cornell gave me of throwing the
exception of me to the dogs (psychiatrists) for attempting to discover the
lunatic fringe that Croizat was apparently the portal to and out without a
degree despite having signed off on an essay that stated the contract in
terms of revealing the meaning of "downward causation". At home, alone.
Ouch that hurts!!

I would like to thank J. Grehan (@ psu.edu) for some correspondence and my
deceased gradfather W.F. Stanley who in effect did with bio-philately where
we are trying to go with technology and biodiversity and who needed no
apologies for genetic research done without the tools of molecular biology.
An unknown can not be come known if the equation remains unsynthesized.
Provine was right, this was a time of constriction NOT SYNTHESIS. Marjore
Green agreed with me on this. Why don't you??