Fulcrum

[Brad McFall]

Again, I have no understanding why Cornell went Ballistic with me as I saw
in 1987 that incidence in and of itself did not demonstrate realtionship
while I lost Kraig Adler's support to structure colubrid scale and muscle
patterns.

He demanded that I get permission from some chap at Rutgers.  Cornell threw
me out and I would probably have said this earlier had I gone to Rutgers
rather than Cornell.  I was also accepted into Michigan.

There has been a problem that philosophers of science have not adequtely
disposed of since Monod expressed the distinction betwwen APRIORI and
APOSTERIORI sHOULD have been dropped being from then on ornamentation as
far as statements about organ I S M S goes.

The point was made that it was a historical mistake not to cite classical
genetics but rather the force-of-bonds-physics for molecular biology did.
I was hoping in 1987 to resolve the more biological light needed by re-
solving in recognition of the older Kant's proof of God by left and right
with bilateral symmetry of analytical embryology a new to radial etc
diversity but realized that plants would be easier to pursue this line of
thinking with than snakes.  For that thought the straight jacket was
brought in.  Personally, my life has been terrible but professionally... Go
Figure. GENETICS DOES NOT CREATE THE SAME SUBSTANTIAL ILLUMINATION THAT
SOLID STATE PHYSICS DOES.