5 Kingdoms
Curtis Clark
jcclark at CSUPOMONA.EDU
Thu Sep 16 17:49:10 CDT 1999
At 10:35 AM 9/14/99 -0700, Frederick W. Schueler wrote:
> The only solution would seem
>to be to recognize kingdoms as in some sense ecological/trophic
>classifications, but that would formally re-introduce the idea of
>phenetic difference, and who knows what consequences might flow from
>that...
Not likely good ones. Microsporidia are intracellular parasites without
mitochondria. 18s rDNA put them on a long branch at the base of the
Eukaryotes, and their lack of mitochondria seemed to confirm that. I heard
a talk at IBC, though, that placed them on the basis of other genes firmly
in the Fung... uh, sorry, Eumycota. Thus making an unemended Protista
*poly*phyletic.
At 06:32 AM 9/16/99 -0700, Ken Kinman wrote:
>eclecticists don't like anything beyond single paraphyly (and of course,
>strict cladists don't like any at all).
We don't *need* to like it.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Curtis Clark http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark/
Biological Sciences Department Voice: (909) 869-4062
California State Polytechnic University FAX: (909) 869-4078
Pomona CA 91768-4032 USA jcclark at csupomona.edu
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list