Ernst Mayr and "Life"
Curtis Clark
jcclark at CSUPOMONA.EDU
Tue Sep 14 22:37:30 CDT 1999
At 10:05 PM 9/13/99 -0700, Ken Kinman wrote:
> I think there have been several versions, from about 7 to 9
>kingdoms (the majority being among the protists).
QED
> Four Kingdoms are stable, easy to teach and learn, and Phylum Eumycota
>falls totally within Kingdom Protista , whether or not you include
chytrids
>within it or as an external ancestral group (take your pick). I have no
>major problems with recognizing a fifth kingdom, but for heaven's sake,
>call
>it Eumyota, not Fungi (since the latter is quite polyphyletic).
Did no one ever teach you about emendation?
>It may seem a bit mean-spirited to keep criticizing his paradigm,
Not only that, but it reduces the force of your arguments, because people
start to see you as a crackpot.
>in this forum, Mayr and Woese themselves agreed on one thing---that the
>results of their debate would have profound implications for the future of
>all science (and biology affects all the sciences, in one way or another).
What if both are wrong in that regard?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Curtis Clark http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark/
Biological Sciences Department Voice: (909) 869-4062
California State Polytechnic University FAX: (909) 869-4078
Pomona CA 91768-4032 USA jcclark at csupomona.edu
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list