new, probably brief subject

[Stuart Fullerton]

must be a different stuart, tain't i in florida.

cheers!  rof



On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Doug Yanega wrote:

> Stuart wrote (and, incidentally, Stuart, do you think you could toggle your
> HTML function to "off"? Thanks):
>
> >Is this assertion generally agreed upon  by those who advocate the
> >Phylogenetic Species Concept?
> >
> >As we all know from a host of celebrated crimes, it is not only possible to
> >distinguish subspecific variability, but also variability among virtually all
> >individuals as well.  Are all individuals, except perhaps identical twins, to
> >be regarded as different species simply because they are genetically
> >distinguishable?
>
> It was stated clearly in the seminal paper on the PSC that if there is so
> much as ONE character shared by all members of population X that is not
> possessed by any members of population Y, then X and Y are separate
> terminal taxa (species). Obviously, that one defining character can be a
> single base pair. I don't know of any species yet defined on that small a
> foundation, but how the PSC interprets such a case is quite unambiguous,
> since base pairs *are* characters.
>
> Peace,
>
>
> Doug Yanega        Dept. of Entomology         Entomology Research Museum
> Univ. of California - Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521
> phone: (909) 787-4315 (standard disclaimer: opinions are mine, not UCR's)
>                 http://insects.ucr.edu/staff/yanega.html
>   "There are some enterprises in which a careful disorderliness
>         is the true method" - Herman Melville, Moby Dick, Chap. 82
>

Stuart M Fullerton ROF, Research Associate in charge of Arthropod
Collections (UCFC), Biology Dept. University of Central Florida, Orlando,
Florida, 32816, USA. stuartf at pegasus.cc.ucf.edu