citation of basionyms

[Jacques Melot]

=A0Le 16/11/98, a 13:26 +0100, nous recevions de Thomas G. Lammers :

>At 07:40 AM 11-15-98 -0700, josephl at AZTEC.ASU.EDU wrote:
>
>>I still have not received a definitive answer to the question
>>I posed last week: if the requirements for valid publication
>>of a plant name (diagnosis/description, type designation,
>>and indication of where the type is housed) are met on
>>different pages of the same book, which page is one supposed
>>to cite in a recombination statement? Please do not
>>answer in terms of page priority, which is a myth not
>>discussed at all in the ICBN.
>
>By example, the Code makes it clear that they are *all*  to be cited.  S=
ee,
>for example, the entry in the list of conserved names (Appendix IIIA) fo=
r
>the genus Canarina (p. 312), where pp. 148, 225, and 588 in Mantissa
>Plantarum are cited.



   La reponse est "all", mais l'exemple de l'Appendice IIIA ne semble pas
bien choisi.

   (En effet, les auteurs de l'Appendix IIIA ont, semble-t-il, choisi de
citer les pages sur lesquelles se trouve le PROTOLOGUE.

Ex. : Appendix IIIA, p. 150, Hypholoma (Fr.) P. Kummer, Fuehr. Pilzk., p.
21 et 72.

1. - chez Kummer, le genre Hypholoma est defini p. 21,
2. - il est seulement utilise, sans definition, p. 72,
2. - le nom est encore cite p. 139 (table des genres), mais pas cite dans
l'Appendix IIIA!)

   Salutations amicales,

   Jacques Melot, Reykjavik



>Thomas G. Lammers
>
>Classification, Nomenclature, Phylogeny and Biogeography
>of the Campanulaceae, s. lat.
>
>Department of Botany
>Field Museum of Natural History
>Roosevelt Road at Lake Shore Drive
>Chicago, Illinois 60605-2496 USA
>
>e-mail:    tlammers at fmnh.org
>office:          312-922-9410 ext. 317 (voice-mail)
>fax:                312-427-2530
>http:    www.fmnh.org/candr/academic_affairs/collection_report/cv_lammer=
s.htm
>-----------------------------------------------------
>"It is far better to attempt great things
> and fail, than to take league with those
> timid souls who know neither
> success nor failure."
>     -- Theodore Roosevelt