quiz (taxonomy)
Servio Tulio Pires Amarante
serviopa at USP.BR
Thu Nov 19 17:50:28 CST 1998
Dear Muniz
The best solution is to regard it as species inquirenda. Doing so, you ar=
e
declaring that the name remain valid but it is necessary to clarify the
species identity problem. If someone discover a type or any other cue to =
the
species identity, it will be simple to attribute the name to the species.=
On
the other hand, if declare it as a nomen dubium, you are definitively
declaring that this name, although available, should not be used for any
species, as it is applicable to anything.
Servio Tulio P. Amarante
Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de S=C3=A3o Paulo
Caixa Postal 42 694
04299-970
S=C3=A3o Paulo, SP
E-mail: serviopa at usp.br
FAX: 5511 274 3690 Tel: 5511 6160 0222
BRASIL
-----Mensagem original-----
De: Luis C. Muniz <lmuniz at NETGATE.COM.BR>
Para: Multiple recipients of list TAXACOM <TAXACOM at CMSA.BERKELEY.EDU>
Data: Quinta-feira, 19 de Novembro de 1998 13:26
Assunto: quiz (taxonomy)
>Dear taxacomers,
>
>I have in hand a good problem:
>
>An author X (in last century) described a species Y, the type is lost an=
d
>no type series was made, the description gives no sufficient data with n=
o
>figure.
>
>How can we name it ?
>species inquirendae, nomem dubium or other ?
>
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>
>Luis C. Muniz
>FIOCRUZ
>Dept. of Helminthology
>Rio de Janeiro - BRASIL
>
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list