Indirect reference
John McNeill
johnmn at COMPUSERVE.COM
Fri May 22 19:19:24 CDT 1998
Hidetoshi Nagamasu wrote:
>I appreciate any comments to the following taxonomic question: =
> =
>Kudo (1925) published many new names for plants in the Table showing the=
ir
>distribution in Yezo, Japan, without description, basionym nor direct
reference to
>their place of valid publication. =
> =
>For the new combination, he just cited the authors validly published the=
>basionym in parenthesis as usual author citation, for example: =
> >Filipendula ciliata (Koidz.) Kudo Sanguisorba japonensis (Makino) Kudo=
>
>Can these new combinations be regarded as validly published with indirec=
t
> references of previously and effectively published description or
diagnosis
>defined in ICBN Tokyo Code Art. 32.5?
The key article in the ICBN is Art. 33.2 which reads:
"33.2. A new combination, or an avowed substitute (nomen novum), publishe=
d
on or after 1 January 1953, for a previously and validly published name i=
s
not validly published unless its basionym (name- bringing or
epithet-bringing synonym) or the replaced synonym (when a new name is
proposed) is clearly indicated and a full and direct reference given to i=
ts
author and place of valid publication with page or plate reference and
date."
As Kudo's work was published in 1925, i.e. before 1 January 1953, the cle=
=3D
ar understanding is that his new combinations do NOT require that the
basion=3D ym be "clearly indicated" and a "full and direct reference give=
n
=2E...". =3D
Very, very many new combinations published in older works (e.g. in the la=
=3D
te 18th & 19th centuries) are in the form used by Kudo and so long as the=
re
=3D is no ambiguity, these are validly published.
As Hidetoshi Nagamasu notes, Art. 32.5 provides a definition of what
"indirect reference" means ("32.5. An indirect reference is a clear
indication, by the citation of the author's name or in some other way, th=
at
a previously and effectively published description or diagnosis applies")=
=2E =
Kudo's action would normal=3D ly meet this definition (the odd exception
might be when an earlier author used the same epithet under more than one=
name applying to closely relate=3D d genera).
John McNeill
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--
John McNeill, Director Emeritus, Royal Ontario Museum,
100 Queen's Park, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2C6, Canada.
[Tel. and fax # 416-586-5744] e-mail: johnmom.on.ca
From 19 April - 5 June 1998: at Royal Botanic Garden, Inverleith Row,
Edinburgh, EH3 5LR, Scotland, UK. Fax: +44-131-248-2901
E-mail will be forwarded, but replies will be from johnmnompuserve.co=3D=
m
Urgent telephone number: +44-131-248-2855
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list