Positivism in evolutionary science
James Francis Lyons-Weiler
weiler at ERS.UNR.EDU
Wed Dec 3 09:18:03 CST 1997
On Wed, 3 Dec 1997, Tom DiBenedetto wrote:
> explanation for this pattern (ever since Darwin at least) is descent;
> i.e. genealogical relationship. Are you proposing that this
> explanation is in doubt, and if so, then what other causal factor(s)
> could result in such patterns?
Organisms do not only acquire traits from their parents
and species do not only aquire traits through geneaology
that are informative of shared ancestry - they also
aquire traits through descent that are misleading. It is
a positivistic position to state that most of the
traits that organisms aquire through genealogy will
have remained informative about shared ancestry. it's
a matter of signal:noise, and to focus only on what we
perceive as signal without (adequately) measuring the
noise is positivistic. Relying on (parsimony) trees
to tell us about the reliability of the information
in the distribution of character states among organisms
is like trying to receive instructions on how to construct
an antenna through the antenna you're trying to construct.
Some parts of the information may come through, but other
parts are jumbled. It's even worse than this analogy, because
at least with radio or television signals we can immediately
recognize the noise (scatter). It would be as if the antenna
would organise the noise into coherent sentences about the
contruction of the antenna that were misleading - and we
would have no independent means of checking the quality of
the reception, because the antenna is making "sense" out
of "nonsense".
Of course, in every case, this problem will exist more or
less, so it's a matter of degree. Let's keep the baby and
clean up the bathwater and get the job done (I think I
avoided a truly mixed metaphor ... whew!).
James Lyons-Weiler
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list