Certainty of progess
Peter Rauch
anamaria at GRINNELL.BERKELEY.EDU
Tue Mar 12 16:21:45 CST 1996
> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 15:29:25 -0700
> From: Joe Laferriere <josephl at CCIT.ARIZONA.EDU>
>
> > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 17:08:38 -0500
> > From: "James H. Beach" <jbeach at NSF.GOV>
> > Subject: Re: Electronic publishing (fwd)
> >
> > Technology will change more quickly every year from now until
> > eternity. It will never congeal. We'll never catch up.
>
> ... A brief perusal of human history will show you that
> nothing is inevitable, that progress can take unexpected directions,
Did Jim say "progress" or "change"?
> sometimes moving several notches backwards. The Fall of Rome set
> civilization back several centuries,
That's a "change"!
> and if you think a similar phenomenon
> today is impossible, you're sadly mistaken. Even on a smaller scale,
> things can move in totally unexpected directions.
I think that's what he was allowing with "change". Historical perspective
yells out that "change" is the only game in town.
> Your statement "technology will change more
> rapidly every year from now until eternity" is, with all due respect,
> totally illogical and completely impossible. The sun will die long before
> the end of eternity.
As far as I'm concerned, eternity ends when I die. The mileage might
vary for others. In any case, for all intents and purposes (human),
eternity ends when the sun gets big.
With some levity, I hope,
Peter
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list