Support for database maintenance
Penny, Norm
npenny at CASMAIL.CALACADEMY.ORG
Mon Nov 27 08:48:55 CST 1995
With regards to recent discussion about NSF support for
maintaining databases, I see a growing problem here. If
NSF is willing to only help create the collection databases,
then there will necessarily be a growing number of
databases, but most will not have the money to support them.
Experience with our Entomology Collections Database at CAS
has shown that it is an enormous task to keep it current,
perhaps even greater than the original data input. For
instance, for every insect family a certain percentage of
the specimens will be sorted only to family level, making an
inventory of those specimens relatively easy. If a
specialist works on these unsorted specimens for a week,
literally thousands, perhaps tens of thousands can be sorted
to a lower level of identity. This one week's activity can
keep a technician modifying the collection database for
weeks.
Collections are already pressed for financial support
for technical staff to maintain the collection itself, and
collection maintenance is a very labor intensive task. To
add another large component to that task - the maintenance
of a collection database - is more than most collections can
handle. Accepting NSF money to create a large collection
database thus becomes a Trojan Horse. After it is created,
the institution is faced with a decision to either divert
scarse resources from traditional (and valuable) tasks, or
let the database collapse. The easiest solution to this
dilemma would be to have NSF support what they have
encouraged.
Norman D. Penny
Senior Collection Manager
Dept. of Entomology
California Academy of Sci.
NPenny at CalAcademy.org
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list