What can we do about it? - reply

Meredith Lane MLANE at UKANVAX.BITNET
Wed Mar 29 10:00:01 CST 1995


On Wed, 29 Mar 1995, Robin Leech wrote:

> Yes, Sir Meredith,
> But with consumption comes $$ flow, and that is the key issue.
> Robin Leech

Robin:
Unfortunately, I do have this idealistic side that thinks our species,
given our evolution-bestowed cleverness, ought to be able to design and
implement a "new economics" that would place us in balance with nature
rather than being at war with it. While I agree with Dick Jensen and you
that we appear to be living in a Keynesian world, there is *nothing* that
says we have to keep subscribing to a _description_ of economics as it
has been practiced since the industrial revolution. Rather, we should be
developing a _prescription_ for our own cultural evolution that would
preserve the balance that sustains us.

Those of you on curriculum committees: Why don't we require economics
students to take at least one course in ecology and one in
evolution/phylogeny?

Meredith A. Lane                Curator, Division of Botany, KU Nat Hist Museum
2045 Constant Ave.                      Assoc. Professor, Dept. of Botany
Lawrence  KS  66047-3729        913/864-4493 or -7364  FAX: -5298 or -5294
                        UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS
        mlane at ukans.edu  OR  mlane at kuhub.cc.ukans.edu

ÿÿ    Re: What can we do about it? - reply                                   Reg




More information about the Taxacom mailing list