What can we do about it? - reply
Meredith Lane
MLANE at UKANVAX.BITNET
Wed Mar 29 10:00:01 CST 1995
On Wed, 29 Mar 1995, Robin Leech wrote:
> Yes, Sir Meredith,
> But with consumption comes $$ flow, and that is the key issue.
> Robin Leech
Robin:
Unfortunately, I do have this idealistic side that thinks our species,
given our evolution-bestowed cleverness, ought to be able to design and
implement a "new economics" that would place us in balance with nature
rather than being at war with it. While I agree with Dick Jensen and you
that we appear to be living in a Keynesian world, there is *nothing* that
says we have to keep subscribing to a _description_ of economics as it
has been practiced since the industrial revolution. Rather, we should be
developing a _prescription_ for our own cultural evolution that would
preserve the balance that sustains us.
Those of you on curriculum committees: Why don't we require economics
students to take at least one course in ecology and one in
evolution/phylogeny?
Meredith A. Lane Curator, Division of Botany, KU Nat Hist Museum
2045 Constant Ave. Assoc. Professor, Dept. of Botany
Lawrence KS 66047-3729 913/864-4493 or -7364 FAX: -5298 or -5294
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS
mlane at ukans.edu OR mlane at kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
ÿÿ Re: What can we do about it? - reply Reg
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list