Pontificating about Proper Pronunciation

[Valery A. Korneyev]

Re: Michael Ivie <ueymi at GEMINI.OSCS.MONTANA.EDU>

Dear Michael,

I am just obliged to reply your posting.

First, I must remain my previous question:

Are there any  VALIDATED RULES  concerning pronunciation of  forein (and
particulary Latin) names in English?

This means, that English, like  every  living language with  its special
history,   has   its  own  evolution   of   different,  sometimes   very
controversial tendencies  in   spelling, grammar, orthoepics and syntax.
But obviously it has some general and special RULES.

You are right, that Enlish, like Russian,  is a  great bastard language,
extremely plastic and  expressive. But  from  time  to  time  people are
trying to  stabilize   it.  An act of such stabilisation is  mirrored in
documents  those  have  a  power equal to  power  of low,  at least, for
so-called "culture people", i.e., to those who  tries to  understand the
inner laws of the system they live  in,  and  who  tries to follow these
rules to withstand the global chaos.

I agree, everyone of us has received different education, and  no one of
us can know every language equally well. And no one of us is allowed to
force another one to act in the way we like.

Every taxonomist   is obliged  to  care  about stability and  purity  of
languages he/she uses. And he/she must follow the  adopted Codes and the
rules of these languages instead of  inventing new rules. Unfortunately,
there are a lot of us who do not care about it.

But, I would like to remind the words of Spinosa:

IGNORANTIA NON EST ARGUMENTUM
                                ("Ethica", pars 1)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Valery A. Korneyev, Executive Editor
Journal of Ukrainian Entomological Societ
Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology, Kiev UA252030 UKRAINE
korval at entom.freenet.kiev.ua
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

At 16:07 December 12/95 -0700, Michael Ivie <ueymi at GEMINI.OSCS.MONTANA.EDU>
wrote:

>The idea that the anglophones of the world are ignorant savages because
>they cannot properly pronounce Latin, while the French, German, Russian,
>etc. scientists do is a crock!!

>On my first trip to Europe in 1984 I visited collections in France, England,
>Germany, and Poland.  In each country, I was told by someone claiming a
>classical education that I was pronouncing the name of my group incorrectly,
>and taught the "right" way.  The problem was, those from each country had a
>different concept of the correct Latin sounds!

>Obviously if the French, Italians and Spanish knew a "correct" Latin,
>there never would have been a French, Italian or Spanish, let alone
>Provincial, Catalan or Romanian. I have it on good authority (from
>Russian systematists in St. Petersburg who obviously know) that Ukrainian
>is simply uneducated Russian spoken with a slur, while from another
>colleague I learned that Russian is just degenerate Polish.  This is the
>same stupid line of reasoning.

>English is proudly a bastard language, which works with words adopted from
>many other languages.  English speakers make these words their own,
>adapting the sounds to those in our repertoire.
>Yet, it can be difficult to understand a native English speaker from
>another region.  Get a rural farmer from Massachusetts together with a
>delta Mississippian and a ghetto dweller from Chicago, and watch the
>fun.  Even Cornwall and Glasgow, or Jamaica and Sidney.  Hong Kong and
>Bombay.  This lack of rigidity is one reason English is so popular as a
>second language.  Its ability to be understood while violating all
>grammatical rules makes it accessible to many imperfect speakers.  When an
>anglophone uses a word borrowed from another language while speaking
>English, the word is being used as ENGLISH and should be pronounced as it
>is in ENGLISH.  To do otherwise is pompous.  If the accepted English
>pronunciation is the same as a proper Latin pronunciation, great, if not,
>tough.  When we speak Latin, it is important to use Latin pronunciation.
>
>Anyway, I cannot believe Latin was ever any different, and I am sick of
>pompous pontificators of superiority making bogus claims.  The phylogeny
>of the language gives credence to variation in pronunciation and
>grammar, which evolved into many languages and dialects.  I really doubt
>any of you proud and proper Latin speakers would be considered very
>a good pronouncer of Latin pronouncer if you were to meet Pliny,
>Julius Ceaser or Pontius Pilate on the street.

>Give it up.

>Michael A. Ivie
>Department of Entomology
>Montana State University
>Bozeman, MT 59717